September 16, 2025


SKDK Ends Contract with Israeli Government Amid Controversy Over Media Strategies

Top Democratic public affairs firm SKDK has terminated its promotional contract with the Israeli government, which primarily focused on portraying Israel's position regarding its conflict in Gaza. This decision abruptly ends a relationship that highlighted significant political communication strategies in a tense international arena.

The $600,000 contract, first spotlighted by POLITICO in March, kicked off in April and was scheduled to conclude by March of the following year. SKDK's role included publicizing the harrowing story of the Bibas family, who tragically lost three members while held captive in Gaza. The firm later shifted its efforts towards securing media placements for voices representing Israel's perspective on the war in Gaza.

Historically aligned with various pro-Israel initiatives, this contract marked SKDK's initial direct engagement with the Israeli government itself. In this venture, SKDK collaborated with European PR giant Havas on behalf of Lapam, Israel's government advertising agency, ultimately serving the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On August 31, SKDK announced it would halt these activities and started the process to de-register as a representative of foreign interests. A spokesperson from SKDK stated that the firm's work "had run its course," though declined to provide specific reasons for the cessation of their services.

The termination followed a controversial report by investigative outlet Sludge, which alleged that part of SKDK's role involved setting up a bot program designed to boost pro-Israel narratives across various social media platforms, including Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, and YouTube. This claim was based on a document linked to the Foreign Agents Registration Act filing. Both SKDK and its parent company, Stagwell, refuted these claims, asserting that their efforts were strictly confined to media relations.

As the story unfolds, responses remain pending from several involved parties. The Israeli embassy in Washington has yet to comment on the situation, and representatives from Havas and Lapam have also not responded to inquiries regarding the matter.

This development raises questions about the influence and boundaries of contracted public relations work in international conflicts and the ethical considerations therein. As SKDK steps back from its role with the Israeli government, the broader implications on public relations ethics and the transparency of media campaigns in conflict zones continue to stir debate.