Republican leaders in Congress are considering a significant extension to the current government funding mechanism as the debate over future spending continues to cause tension. With the looming threat of a shutdown, GOP officials are discussing a new continuing resolution that could potentially extend government funding until December 2026.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise has confirmed that an extended stopgap is on the table. Despite the pressures of upcoming holiday deadlines, Scalise expressed his commitment to avoiding last-minute legislative rushes, which he claims Democrats have exploited in the past to push through unfavorable deals. “We're not going to do that,” Scalise stated firmly, emphasizing an intention to steer clear of critical deadline pressures.

The discussions reveal a split within the party, as some members express reluctance to support a long-term continuing resolution. Representative Beth Van Duyne from Texas voiced her reservations, particularly criticizing the spending limits previously set by Democrats, and remained non-committal on her vote for any future legislation until she can review its specifics.

On the other side of the spectrum, House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith floated the idea of a stopgap that would stretch into late 2026. Such a measure would not only cover the upcoming fiscal year but also bypass the next midterm elections, potentially reducing the frequency of fiscal standoffs in Congress.

However, this proposal for an unusually lengthy extension has been met with resistance from other Republican appropriators. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins mentioned her concerns about extending the funding too far beyond the end of this year, highlighting the divisions among Republicans on the best path forward.

The final decision on the duration of the continuing resolution will require careful negotiation within the GOP and between Congress and President Donald Trump, who must ultimately sign off on the measure. The ongoing discussions reflect broader tensions within the party as they balance the need for fiscal responsibility with the practicalities of governing.