January 7, 2026


House Democrats Seek to Limit Trump's Military Actions in Venezuela with War Powers Resolution

In a renewed effort to check presidential powers, House Democrats are gearing up to introduce a War Powers Resolution aimed at restricting President Donald Trump's military engagements in Venezuela. This legislative push comes in the wake of a controversial U.S. operation to apprehend Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

The proposed resolution, expected to mirror a similar measure from last year that narrowly failed in the then-GOP-dominated House, is drawing particular attention. With the military's recent mobilization in the Caribbean, Democrats are optimistic about rallying bipartisan support this time around. Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, a leading figure on the Rules Committee and co-author of the initial measure, hinted at "minor adjustments" to the previous text but maintained that the core intent would remain unchanged.

Tuesday's strategy session saw key Democratic figures, including those with military expertise such as Representatives Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), Jason Crow (D-Colo.), and Pat Ryan (D-N.Y.), deliberating the resolution's wording and strategic implications. These discussions underscore the cautious approach Democrats are taking, wary of a broadly worded resolution that could inadvertently signal congressional acquiescence to expanded military actions under Trump's directive.

According to Representative Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, the essence of last year's defeated resolution is likely to be preserved in the new draft. Meeks emphasized the importance of precise language that conveys clear congressional oversight over military decisions pertaining to Venezuela.

As the House Democrats finalize their proposal, the resolution not only highlights the growing congressional scrutiny of military interventions abroad but also sets the stage for a potential partisan showdown over U.S. foreign policy and executive power. The coming weeks will be critical as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle weigh the implications of restraining or endorsing the President's military strategies in Latin America.