January 13, 2026


Clintons Refuse to Testify in Epstein Case, Face Potential Contempt Charges

Bill and Hillary Clinton have chosen not to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee regarding their alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein, thereby defying congressional subpoenas. This refusal could lead to potential contempt of Congress charges, escalating a significant legal and political confrontation.

The Clintons were due for closed-door depositions this week, but their legal team has dismissed the subpoenas as "invalid and legally unenforceable," asserting that they are intended to "embarrass political rivals." This claim was detailed in a letter from the Clintons' attorneys to House Oversight Chair James Comer, which was later obtained by POLITICO.

According to the letter, the Clintons believe they have already provided all pertinent information relating to the late Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her role in a sex trafficking scheme. The attorneys accused the investigation of being politically motivated, orchestrated by allies of former President Donald Trump.

Chairman Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, expressed his intention to move forward with contempt proceedings if the Clintons continue to evade the subpoenas. A vote to hold Bill Clinton in contempt is already slated for next week's committee markup, with a similar action possible for Hillary Clinton if she fails to comply.

The use of contempt of Congress charges has varied implications, ranging from symbolic to severe, including possible imprisonment. This tactic was notably employed during the Trump administration against Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, both of whom faced legal penalties for non-compliance with subpoenas from the committee investigating the January 6 attacks.

The political stakes are high, reminiscent of the "lock her up" chants directed at Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign over her use of a private email server. The current administration's aggressive stance towards its perceived adversaries suggests that the outcome of these contempt proceedings could carry significant legal ramifications for the Clintons.

As this legal drama unfolds, the implications extend beyond the personal legal troubles for the Clintons, potentially influencing broader political dynamics and public perceptions of justice and accountability in high-profile cases.