New demands to "defund ICE" have echoed within the Democratic Party following a fatal incident involving a federal agent in Minneapolis. Despite these calls, leading Democrats are maneuvering to fund the agency while imposing strict conditions on its operations.

This situation underscores a paradox in congressional dynamics: lawmakers can only introduce checks on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by allocating billions in taxpayer funds, aiming to temper President Trump's aggressive immigration policies.

As the deadline to prevent a government shutdown on January 30 looms, Democrats are pushing for new mandates for Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents, including the adoption of body cameras, a ban on masks during operations, and enhanced training protocols.

Recent polls show increasing public support for dissolving ICE, especially after the January 7 shooting of Renee Good. However, senior Democrats believe in reforming rather than dismantling the agency. "House Democrats demand oversight of ICE," stated Rep. Pete Aguilar, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability.

Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, like Rep. Darren Soto, advocate for addressing the "culture of violence" within ICE, seeking reforms rather than outright abolition. Similarly, the Congressional Progressive Caucus has conditionally opposed new funding unless significant reforms are implemented.

Republican leaders, represented by House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, interpret these Democratic demands as favoring more lenient immigration policies, complicating bipartisan agreement on DHS funding.

Democrats are wary of extending current funding measures which they believe would further empower the Trump administration. "The question for Republicans is whether they are prepared to shut down the government to support an unrestrained DHS," posed Sen. Chris Murphy on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Despite the complexities, some bipartisan interest in regulating ICE's actions persists. Following the Minnesota shooting, GOP Senator Lisa Murkowski called for policy changes to ensure ICE operations are conducted with empathy and respect for human life.

As negotiations continue, both parties recognize the gravity of the political and humanitarian implications of ICE funding and operations. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins noted that while no agreement has been reached yet, the possibility remains open.

The ongoing discussions highlight a critical juncture for U.S. immigration policy, balancing security concerns with civil liberties and human rights. Both sides of the aisle must navigate a politically charged environment to reach a resolution that aligns with national values and legal standards.

Calen Razor contributed to this report.