In the wake of President Donald Trump's recent military action in Iran, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, Democratic figures with military backgrounds are increasingly stepping into the spotlight. Among them is Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), a combat veteran and vocal critic of the current administration's foreign policy. Since the operation began 15 days ago, Gallego has made nearly a dozen media appearances, articulating a raw and personal perspective shaped by his service in Iraq in 2005.

Gallego's candid assessments, such as his critique of Secretary of State Marco Rubio's handling of the situation and expressions of concern for military personnel at risk, resonate with a Democratic base seeking assurance in tumultuous times. His recent appearance on CNN’s “The Source with Kaitlin Collins” highlighted his blunt approach, as he spoke about the personal toll of war and the ongoing challenges veterans face, including PTSD.

Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, both with combat experience, have also been prominent voices. Maryland Governor Wes Moore, another veteran, has connected the conflict's impact on gas prices directly to voter’s wallets on local radio, illustrating the broader economic implications of military engagements.

As the Democratic Party debates the qualities needed in their next presidential candidate, the focus has turned to these veterans. Their firsthand combat experience and their ability to discuss complex security issues with authenticity could be pivotal. In an era where foreign policy could dominate the 2028 presidential election, the party is contemplating a shift towards candidates who can intertwine military acumen with political insight.

Gallego, who is slated to appear at a VoteVets Action town hall in San Antonio, Texas, later this month, continues to emphasize the human aspects of military engagements. "It leaves a mark on you," he shared in an interview, reflecting on his grueling experiences in combat zones. His perspective is not just about strategic calculations but the irreversible human costs of conflict.

Experts like Doug Wilson, former assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, underscore the necessity for a candidate who not only projects strength but also possesses the judgment and resolve that resonates with voters on an instinctual level. This sentiment is echoed by Matt Bennett of the think tank Third Way, who notes the potential for these veteran candidates to shape the narrative, even though the extent and duration of national security's influence on voter decisions remain uncertain.

Amid these discussions, non-veteran voices like Senator Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) have also found traction by criticizing the administration's impersonal handling of the war’s human toll. This mix of perspectives within the Democratic Party underscores the diverse approaches to foreign policy and leadership credentials being considered ahead of the next election cycle.

As the party evaluates its options, the integration of military service and policy expertise may well define the Democratic narrative, offering a stark contrast to potential Republican candidates with their own deep national security backgrounds. The coming months will likely see these conversations intensify as the Democrats seek to align their message with the concerns and aspirations of a restless electorate.

Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's Playbook newsletter.