Before the dust settles on the 2026 World Cup, the selection of Morocco and Saudi Arabia as hosts for the 2030 and 2034 tournaments, respectively, is raising eyebrows and stirring concerns among human rights advocates. These countries, known for their strict laws against homosexuality, have pledged to adhere to global human rights norms, yet critics remain skeptical.

Morocco, teaming up with Spain and Portugal for 2030, has laws criminalizing same-sex relationships, a stance that puts the safety and freedom of LGBTQ+ fans at risk. Saudi Arabia, the solo host in 2034, also prohibits homosexuality under Islamic law. Both nations have submitted human rights strategies as part of their World Cup bids, promising adherence to international standards without specifically addressing LGBTQ+ rights.

Steve Cockburn, from Amnesty International, emphasizes that while FIFA, the governing body of world soccer, is not a global law enforcer, it has significant influence to advocate for protective measures. The ongoing debate focuses on FIFA's role in promoting human rights and the extent of its responsibilities.

Criticism isn't new to FIFA; it faced backlash in 2022 when it penalized players for supporting LGBTQ+ rights during the Qatar World Cup. Similar concerns were echoed in the 2018 World Cup in Russia regarding laws against "gay propaganda." Despite these controversies, FIFA approved the bids from Morocco and Saudi Arabia without contest, prompting further scrutiny.

According to Morocco's human rights strategy, its independent committee alongside the Moroccan Football Federation aims to encourage governmental alignment with key international conventions. Saudi Arabia's approach mirrors this, asserting ongoing legislative reviews to maintain commitments to anti-discrimination.

However, the general statements in these strategies have not quelled fears. Cockburn criticizes the vagueness of the commitments, calling for a more transparent and candid discussion to ensure that fans are not left in ambiguity regarding their safety.

The Fare network and Football v Homophobia express concerns about FIFA's cautious stance on these issues, fearing it may lead to inaction. Jon Holmes points out the need for a more proactive approach from FIFA to truly address and support LGBTQ+ rights.

As the World Cup approaches, the focus often shifts to the excitement of the games, overshadowing underlying human rights issues. Ryan Trustcott, a scholar in international sports politics, reflects on how the thrill of the tournament often leads to a temporary overlook of its impact on human rights advancements.

The choice of Morocco and Saudi Arabia as hosts has reignited a crucial conversation about the intersection of global sports events and human rights practices. As preparations for the upcoming World Cups continue, the world watches closely, hoping for progress and inclusivity in line with the spirited unity that football is supposed to embody.